Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comlink
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft redirect to wikt:commlink. (non-admin closure) J947 (c), at 03:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comlink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced, no indication of notability, possible OR. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 17:42, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 18:28, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Soft redirect to Wiktionary as a WP:DICDEF.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:08, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. It isn't in dictionary.com so I'm not certain it is a real word, nor does this look like a delete. I thought about a merge to communication link, that redirects to Datalink. It could probably merge to Transceiver. Szzuk (talk) 15:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Soft Redirect to Wiktionary (specifically, wikt:comlink or wikt:commlink) per WP:POINTWIKT. The title is searched for, has a relevant entry in Wiktionary, does not have a viable target for redirection here, and the title doesn't have much scope (largely science fiction oriented, so I do not think redirecting to transceiver would be appropriate). Therefore, I come to the conclusion that a soft redirect may be appropriate (per the steps outlined in Template:Wiktionary redirect). --TheSandDoctor Talk 05:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.